@JayGo & @Theycallmemrr, Finally!
Reference my ask below...
https://thelawnforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=25344
I am happy to contribute to the Google Sheet! Here are some thoughts...
- Wherever possible, it should be easy to see who on the The Lawn Forum made the entry rather than jumping around between the document and thelawnforum.com .
- A compatible mix should be physical and chemical. In other words, physical compatibility should be legit jar test and chemical compatibility should consider any label notations that indicate this compatibility (or not).
Often I've noticed that there are 'tank partner' compatibilities from the manufacturer labels themselves which should indicate both a prescribed physical and chemical compatibility. Sometimes chemical brand/active ingredient compatibilities are not listed as specific products, but as purely a chemical relationship like, 'not compatible with copper fertilizers'.
Given all of this and physical jar test compatibilities can be performed reasonable accurately ourselves, then we can notate that compatibility first - even if we don't have a confirmed chemical compatibility.
Thoughts?
I did a test on my early-Spring pre emergents of Specticle Flo & Prodiamine. The physical mix passed well and I could not find any chemical incompatibilities. I'll throw this one on the Google spreadsheet.
It would surely be nice if thelawnforum.com had some sort of collaborative document or Wiki functionality so we didn't have to jump off of this user group site.