I read through this http://www.aces.edu/anr/soillab/forms/d ... y-324A.pdf
Before we proceed, Keep in mind we are throwing hand grenades not darts.
On page 5 -"Manganese is high in almost all Alabama soils and is not recommended for any crop."
The only statement I can make with even some confidence is that Mn has an antagonistic relationship with Mg. Mn can interfere with the plant uptake/use of Mg. Otherwise, articles have stated that there is no known toxic level for Mn, that Mn levels can become toxic at low soil pH levels, that Mn deficiencies are more likely as soil pH levels raise above 6, that Mn sufficiency levels for turf should be greater than 30 ppm (Carrow, et al. sufficiency guidelines https://www.paceturf.org/PTRI/Documents/Soil_tis/0309ref.pdf), to Mn levels below 50 ppm are sufficient and levels above 50 ppm are excessive and tissue levels below 20 ppm are often deficient, levels of 30 to 200 ppm are optimal and levels exceeding 300 ppm are often detrimental/excessive or toxic (Cornell Fact Sheet on Crops http://nmsp.cals.cornell.edu/publications/factsheets/factsheet49.pdf). The take-away: with a Mn level of 284 ppm, you might be well advised to avoid adding any source of Mn in the future.
I did find this http://www.aces.edu/pubs/docs/A/ANR-0449/ where there is a breakdown of nutrient usage by crop. Yes, I know Bermuda grass isn't on there but I want to use this as an example for discussion. Lets assume all clippings are collected. The category for Bermudagrass hay asserts that 32lb of Sulfur per acre will be consumed. If my soil is showing sulfur at 20ppm (so 40lb per acre?) wouldn't I be apt to run into a shortage of sulfur if the Bermuda grass will consume 32lb per acre? Granted, I have no clue how much Bermuda grass turf will use compared to a hay field.
For guidance, see the Carrow site above where recommended sufficiency range levels for sulfur is 15-40 ppm and this for usage rate:
Annual maintenance nutrient (N and K or any sulfate containing ammendment) applications can be used as your sulfur source.
Also, I went and reviewed my soil tests from the Auburn University soil lab.
These measurements are all in pounds per acre.
6-16-2015 (Front yard) Auburn University Mehlich-1 extract; No amendments had been placed on the yard in 3+ years
pH 6.0
P 136lb/A
K 138lb/A
Mg 373lb/A
Ca 3008lb/A
10-12-2016 (Back yard) Auburn University Mehlich-1 extract; No amendments had been placed on the yard in 3+ years
pH 6.3
P 189lb/A
K 493lb/A
Mg 534lb/A
Ca 4579lb/A
2-6-2018 (Back yard) Auburn University Mehlich-1 extract; Only thing applied between previous test and this test was lots of AS and urea fert, along with all purpose fert.
pH 6.0
P 211lb/A
K 511lb/A
Mg 330lb/A
Ca 2002lb/A
6-15-2018 (Back yard) Waypoint test
pH 5.5
P 242lb/A
K 502lb/A
Mg 292lb/A
Ca 2660lb/A
Comparing results from different labs (no matter how good the labs) and especially between tests using different extraction methods, isn't advisable for drawing reliable conclusions. My understanding is that Results from the same lab on the very same soil sample using the same methods can vary by 5% if done the same month using the same extract batches and can vary as much as 10% when preformed 6-12 months later.
So are these swings different due to poor sampling? Top dressing with sand? Spreading lots of stump wood chip debris upon the ground which then decomposed prior to sprigging? Applying 13lb of N of Ammonium Sulfate + Urea blend in one growing season (39lb of 33%N product per 1,000 sqft)? Applying 3lb of N-P-K (nitrogen is accounted for in that 13lb) in one growing season?
Maybe. That and more, including what I tend to classify as "soil dynamics" (rainfall, temperature, irrigation, irrigation pH etc., etc., etc.) That's why it's so important to eliminate as many variables as possible by taking numerous samples, mixing them well,, keeping depth as consistant as possible, taking samples in the same month each year, etc.) (I like using mah exceteras :lol: ).
Briefly onto the pH impact of all the fert I applied - if I put down 40lb per 1k of Ammonium Sulfate, with an impact of -110/100lb CCE, wouldn't that have moved the pH about half a point? 6 to 5.5? I also applied 15lb per 1k of all purpose, some 15-15-15, some 10-10-10, some 19-19-19. I'm just trying to make sure I under how to anticipate how my pH is going to be impacted by whatever fert I'm applying this year, and whether I should switch from AS+urea blend to straight urea, or switch to something like Calcium or potassium nitrate?
Soil pH is the result of the equilibrium between H+ in solution and on Cation sites. Considering that labs and soil scientists can calculate the meq of H+ held on soil exchange sites based on Buffer pH and calculate the resultant soil solution pH, I'm pretty confidant that one could determine the amount of H+ needed down to the atom for pH level and the amount of a substance needed to supply that amount of H+. However, due to "soil dynamics", that ends up just an estimate. For example: the calculation for lime amount needed to neutralize H+ is only accurate to within 500 lbs (some claim 50)/ acre or + or - 10 lbs/M in the field. Neither my knowledge base, skill level nor size of my brain is sufficient to make those calculations.
Furthermore, I'm also trying to confirm that the pH result from waypoint is reflective, ie, does the math add up on what I applied last season taking my pH from 6.0 to 5.5?
I trust no one. I don't know what Buffer pH test Waypoint uses to determine that reported buffer pH. If it were me, I'd call them and ask, and ask them if they could refer you to the LRI index they use to determine the lime recommendation for those Buffer pH results. (LRI charts for all the major tests used to be readily available on the net, but are hard to find these days for some reason).
@Movingshrub I wanted to add that the results from having a buffer pH test can be a double check on the accuracy of the reported soil solution pH, but to use it , you need to know
what test was performed and it helps to have the LRI too.
Hope some of that was of help.