Lawn Care Forum banner

Milorganite hype

37K views 121 replies 44 participants last post by  Ware  
#1 ·
I know a lot of people on YouTube rave about how much they love Milorganite. I have tried it many many times, and I never get that great of results. I have zoysia turf (live in NW FL) and it just really doesn't respond as much as when I use a synthetic fertilizer (that contains slow release granules).

I know Milorganite really seems to help out a lot of folks, but it seems like a lot of that turf is cool season grasses. Is it not as effective on warm season turf? Plus the stuff really smells bad the first few days after it is put down and is quite pricey when compared to synthetics. Am I missing something???
 
#16 ·
You're not missing anything. There's two general ways to go about managing plants: 1. throw down popularly hyped miracle products (usually in ever increasing quantity - more must be better, right?); results based on dumb luck that the products supply what the plants swimming in the stuff actually need; requires some work and a lot of money to apply it all, but virtually zero thought.

2. Determine what is lacking and supply it; results proven through many decades of scientific research and actual field testing; requires less work and lower cost, but a lot of planning and thought.

To many in the Milorganite cult, synthetic fert, even slow release, is the devil that will eventually kill all living things on earth, and most certainly your lawn. Of course, many, many pounds of heat processed microbe carcasses with zero potassium, thrown down as heavily as can be afforded, are our salvation.

Do soil testing, observe the turf health, apply what it needs when it needs it. You will get much better results.
 
#17 ·
@Delmarva Keith I agree. I was just comparing my results with the two... Milo vs synthetic. I have had great results with my synthetics compared to Milo. All was put out at the correct rate. I just didn't get the results that most people seem to get and was wondering if they apply a lot more than what label recommends? My soil test came back pretty good, just a little low in PH
 
#20 ·
Redtenchu said:
rhanna said:
I think at the end of the day you just have to throw down what works for you.
+1

People can say and use what they want, but some of the best looking warm and cool season lawns on this site are fertilized with Milorganite. I wouldn't call that hype, I'd call it results.
If that's all they throw down, I'd call it dumb luck. :mrgreen:

The place where I grew up (far North of here) had an incredible lawn that never saw fert or even supplemental water. Of course, the house was built on a former farm field with enough OM and manure in the soil to last until the sun goes supernova. :nod: I could have put anything I wanted on it and everyone would call that the next miracle product.

If the native soil has enough naturally ocurring K and not excessive P, have at it with as much Milorganite as you want. :thumbup:
 
#23 ·
@Ware I only follow a couple of warm season lawn journals regularly, but your's is one.
I know you are doing some level correction based on a soil test. Prior to that were you applying a potassium supplement to your lawn? I think we both used the greens grade Milo exclussively. Do you recall if the guaranteed analysis for your Milo has always been 6-2-0? Whereas, until 2 years ago, my locally available greens grade was 6-4-0. In addition to the Milo, I regularly applied triple NPK which provided potassium. It also provided P and between the two, I've ended up with enough P in the soil to sustain the turf needs until the end of time.
 
#24 ·
Ridgerunner said:
@Ware I only follow a couple of warm season lawn journals regularly, but your's is one.
I know you are doing some level correction based on a soil test. Prior to that were you applying a potassium supplement to your lawn? I think we both used the greens grade Milo exclussively. Do you recall if the guaranteed analysis for your Milo has always been 6-2-0? Whereas, until 2 years ago, my locally available greens grade was 6-4-0. In addition to the Milo, I regularly applied triple NPK which provided potassium. It also provided P and between the two, I've ended up with enough P in the soil to sustain the turf needs until the end of time.
Over the last few seasons I have used mostly Milorganite, but also some 24-0-5 and 12-6-6. I boosted the K with the Sulfate of Potash this year after I got my soil test results back. I don't recall the timing of changes in the Milorganite analysis, but you observation sounds familiar.

I can't get over how polarizing the stuff is - everybody likes what they like. :lol:
 
#25 ·
Don't get me wrong, I think it's a great product.
Very error proof.
I like the low NPK so you can throw down a lot and spread it very evenly.
I like the iron source that won't stain your driveway.

I don't like the normal price 13 per bag and I don't like the smell. To some it smells like success but to me it smells like crap lol.
 
#26 ·
rhanna said:
Don't get me wrong, I think it's a great product.
Very error proof.
I like the low NPK so you can throw down a lot and spread it very evenly.
I like the iron source that won't stain your driveway.
I agree - I think it's perfect in just about every way. I even like the smell. You can't really put too much out, it doesn't burn, it's slow release, etc. I even drop some into the hole where I plant a tree or bush. The cost is the only thing that holds me back.