Don't take my word for it - I just wanted to start the conversation. :mrgreen:social port said:Thanks for posting this. I'm going to be looking into sand sources in the future.
I think there was some wizardry at play in that rumorwardconnor said:Exactly folks. Who the crap was it that started the retarded rumor that clay plus sand equals concrete? This is evidence that it is NOT correct.
That concrete rumor is a real pisser offer for sure.
I see what you did there.Mightyquinn said:I think there was some wizardry at play in that rumorwardconnor said:Exactly folks. Who the crap was it that started the retarded rumor that clay plus sand equals concrete? This is evidence that it is NOT correct.
That concrete rumor is a real pisser offer for sure.![]()
Your soil can become concrete and contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer http://www.patwelsh.com/soils/never-add-clay-to-sand-or-sand-to-clay/wardconnor said:Exactly folks. Who the crap was it that started the retarded rumor that clay plus sand equals concrete? This is evidence that it is NOT correct.
That concrete rumor is a real pisser offer for sure.
Some agronomists with craniorectal inversion that wanted to ensure home lawns would be crappy and hard to maintain vs their perfect greens, fairways, and sports fields.wardconnor said:Exactly folks. Who the crap was it that started the retarded rumor that clay plus sand equals concrete? This is evidence that it is NOT correct.
That concrete rumor is a real pisser offer for sure.
While you may be right, most of what I've read (and I try to read all I can since I have calcareous clay) speaks more about amendment with sand - ie, tilling sand into the clay. Your sand capping, to me, doesn't meet that definition. I have been worried about even capping mine, but I have a few test areas working for a couple of years now that seem to be great. Even digging in those areas is easier than the rest of the yard, much like Connor's video.Greendoc said:Some agronomists with craniorectal inversion that wanted to ensure home lawns would be crappy and hard to maintain vs their perfect greens, fairways, and sports fields.wardconnor said:Exactly folks. Who the crap was it that started the retarded rumor that clay plus sand equals concrete? This is evidence that it is NOT correct.
That concrete rumor is a real pisser offer for sure.
Mr Ware is stirring the pot.Ware said:Don't take my word for it - I just wanted to start the conversation. :mrgreen:
The Repair Man called in a special favor. 🤔wardconnor said:OK folks.... I will do a core aerate with a Toro procore aerator. After the aeration, I will collect the cores and topdress immediately after with sand and drag the sand into the holes. This will and should amend the clay with sand as was mentioned above. We shall then see if the clay turns to concrete.
This will happen likely in the fall on my channel. I had it scheduled for 2 days ago but it was a no go when my hunny shut me down when I told her that it was going to cost some coin.
What does bermuda have to do with growing grass? :rofl:dfw_pilot said:As if bermuda couldn't grow in concrete hard clay anyway, haha.
I'll just leave these here.Ware said:Don't take my word for it - I just wanted to start the conversation. :mrgreen:social port said:Thanks for posting this. I'm going to be looking into sand sources in the future.
I think this might be a key sentence from one of the papers: "However, combined with organic amendments, some sand will help open up the compacting characteristics of clay soil." First off, as you note, what we all call "clay" likely isn't actually clay. Maybe more significantly, it would be just about impossible, as a practical matter, to exclude organic matter during the process of aerating and sand topdressing. It's possible and even likely that over the course of time and many applications, the process results in a "clay" / sand / organic matter mix that is beneficial to root penetration and drainage, and is not a brick.viva_oldtrafford said:... Seems we've stumbled upon settled science. Conversation ended? If not, can someone explain how the physical properties of S and C allow them to not create a brick-like texture?
I think it's worth noting that, despite what some people may think, their soil would need to contain no less than 40% clay, while simultaneously having higher levels of both sand and silt (or clay + very high levels of sand alone / clay + low-high levels of silt alone)in order to be classified as strictly clay.
When we aerify greens, we use a 100% sand - there's almost no point in aerifying, only to go back with material that contains OM. With that said, you're probably right, getting a 100% sand mix for the homeowner might be a little more difficult (though not impossible). I wonder if any of these guys that do leveling projects get a particle size breakdown when the load is dropped in their driveway.Delmarva Keith said:I think this might be a key sentence from one of the papers: "However, combined with organic amendments, some sand will help open up the compacting characteristics of clay soil." First off, as you note, what we all call "clay" likely isn't actually clay. Maybe more significantly, it would be just about impossible, as a practical matter, to exclude organic matter during the process of aerating and sand topdressing. It's possible and even likely that over the course of time and many applications, the process results in a "clay" / sand / organic matter mix that is beneficial to root penetration and drainage, and is not a brick.viva_oldtrafford said:... Seems we've stumbled upon settled science. Conversation ended? If not, can someone explain how the physical properties of S and C allow them to not create a brick-like texture?
I think it's worth noting that, despite what some people may think, their soil would need to contain no less than 40% clay, while simultaneously having higher levels of both sand and silt (or clay + very high levels of sand alone / clay + low-high levels of silt alone)in order to be classified as strictly clay.![]()